Software en Construcción: Un estudio comparativo de Herramientas para el control en Planificación y Ejecución

Abstract

This research presents a comparative analysis of five budgeting software tools used in the construction sector in Ecuador: InterPro, ProExcel, Microsoft Project, Opus, and S10. The main objective is to evaluate their key functions in cost management and project planning. A mixed-method approach was adopted, combining a qualitative analysis of each program’s features with a quantitative study based on surveys conducted among industry professionals, as well as the preparation of a reference budget using each software. The SWOT methodology (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) was applied to identify and assess the advantages and limitations of each tool, establishing objective criteria for their selection based on accessibility, ease of use, report generation, and data linkage. The results reveal that InterPro provides a comprehensive solution with complete reports and an intuitive interface, while Opus stands out for its integration with Excel and its efficiency in review processes. S10, ProExcel, and Microsoft Project emerge as complementary alternatives, although their application may be constrained by user proficiency or by the software’s primary focus on scheduling rather than budgeting. This study offers a technical framework to guide the selection of the most suitable tool for budget management in civil construction projects, contributing to the optimization of processes and the strengthening of planning, control, and project execution within the Ecuadorian context.