Sephadex filtration as successful alternative to density-gradient centrifugation procedures for ram sperm selection with improved kinetics

dc.contributor.authorGalarza Lucero, Diego Andrés
dc.contributor.authorLopez Sebastian, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorWoelders, Henry
dc.contributor.authorBlesbois, Elisabeth
dc.contributor.authorSantiago Moreno, Julián
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-20T17:16:55Z
dc.date.available2018-06-20T17:16:55Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.descriptionDensity-gradients centrifugation (DGC) and filtration columns (FC) are used to separate deformed or dead sperm, debris, and other cells that may negatively affect the fertilizing capacity of sperm in fresh, chilled and frozen/thawed semen. The present study was conducted to evaluate the suitability of DGC (BoviPure®, Percoll® and Accudenz®) and FC (Sephadex G-15®) sperm selection procedures for fresh-extended and cold-stored ram semen by assessment of post-treatment sperm quality variables. Twenty normospermic ejaculates from ten adult Merino rams were used. Sperm concentration of recovered cells was greater (P < 0.001) after BoviPure treatment than other procedures in both fresh and cold semen. With the Sephadex method, there were more desirable values than with use of DGC procedures in several sperm motility variables measured by using the CASA system. In non-refrigerated semen samples, the percentage of progressive sperm motility (%PSM) after Sephadex filtration was greater (P < 0.05) than after BoviPure treatment; the straightline velocity (VSL) value after Sephadex filtration was greater (P < 0.01) than after Accudenz treatment; the amplitude of lateral head displacement (ALH) after Sephadex and Accudenz treatment was less than non-filtered semen (P < 0.001) and after Percoll (P < 0.01) and BoviPure (P < 0.05) treatments. In cold-stored semen samples, the %PSM after Sephadex filtration was greater than non-filtered (P < 0.05) semen and after BoviPure (P < 0.05), Percoll (P < 0.05) and Accudenz (P < 0.001) treatments. It is concluded that Sephadex column filtration can be used to select ram sperm in non-refrigerated and cooled semen, because percentage progressively motile sperm and some other sperm motility characteristics are greater with use of this techniques as compared with use of DGC methods.
dc.description.abstractDensity-gradients centrifugation (DGC) and filtration columns (FC) are used to separate deformed or dead sperm, debris, and other cells that may negatively affect the fertilizing capacity of sperm in fresh, chilled and frozen/thawed semen. The present study was conducted to evaluate the suitability of DGC (BoviPure®, Percoll® and Accudenz®) and FC (Sephadex G-15®) sperm selection procedures for fresh-extended and cold-stored ram semen by assessment of post-treatment sperm quality variables. Twenty normospermic ejaculates from ten adult Merino rams were used. Sperm concentration of recovered cells was greater (P < 0.001) after BoviPure treatment than other procedures in both fresh and cold semen. With the Sephadex method, there were more desirable values than with use of DGC procedures in several sperm motility variables measured by using the CASA system. In non-refrigerated semen samples, the percentage of progressive sperm motility (%PSM) after Sephadex filtration was greater (P < 0.05) than after BoviPure treatment; the straightline velocity (VSL) value after Sephadex filtration was greater (P < 0.01) than after Accudenz treatment; the amplitude of lateral head displacement (ALH) after Sephadex and Accudenz treatment was less than non-filtered semen (P < 0.001) and after Percoll (P < 0.01) and BoviPure (P < 0.05) treatments. In cold-stored semen samples, the %PSM after Sephadex filtration was greater than non-filtered (P < 0.05) semen and after BoviPure (P < 0.05), Percoll (P < 0.05) and Accudenz (P < 0.001) treatments. It is concluded that Sephadex column filtration can be used to select ram sperm in non-refrigerated and cooled semen, because percentage progressively motile sperm and some other sperm motility characteristics are greater with use of this techniques as compared with use of DGC methods.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.03.022
dc.identifier.issn0378-4320
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378432018301362?via%3Dihub
dc.language.isoes_ES
dc.sourceAnimal Reproduction Science
dc.subjectSperm
dc.subjectSelection
dc.subjectFiltration
dc.subjectCentrifugation
dc.subjectGradients
dc.titleSephadex filtration as successful alternative to density-gradient centrifugation procedures for ram sperm selection with improved kinetics
dc.title.alternativeSperm selection methods in Ram
dc.typeARTÍCULO
dc.ucuenca.afiliacionGalarza, D., Universidad de Cuenca, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Cuenca, Ecuador; Galarza, D., Departamento de Reproducción Animal, INIA, MADRIR, España
dc.ucuenca.afiliacionLopez, A., Departamento de Reproducción Animal, INIA, MADRIR, España
dc.ucuenca.afiliacionWoelders, H., Wageningen University and Research, Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen, Holanda
dc.ucuenca.afiliacionBlesbois, E., Francois Rabelais University, UMR, Nouzilly, Francia
dc.ucuenca.afiliacionSantiago, J., Departamento de Reproducción Animal, INIA, MADRIR, España
dc.ucuenca.areaconocimientofrascatiamplio4. Ciencias Agrícolas
dc.ucuenca.areaconocimientofrascatiespecifico4.3 Medicina Veterinaria
dc.ucuenca.areaconocimientounescoamplio08 - Agricultura, Silvicultura, Pesca y Veterinaria
dc.ucuenca.areaconocimientounescodetallado0841 - Veterinaria
dc.ucuenca.areaconocimientounescoespecifico084 - Veterinaria
dc.ucuenca.correspondenciaGalarza Lucero, Diego Andres, dgalarza@ucm.es
dc.ucuenca.cuartilQ1
dc.ucuenca.factorimpacto88
dc.ucuenca.idautor0103912846
dc.ucuenca.idautor50277294F
dc.ucuenca.idautor0000-0002-7091-2131
dc.ucuenca.idautor0000-0001-8182-6602
dc.ucuenca.idautor0000-0001-5551-8120
dc.ucuenca.indicebibliograficoSCOPUS
dc.ucuenca.numerocitaciones0
dc.ucuenca.urifuentehttps://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/animal-reproduction-science/vol/192/suppl/C
dc.ucuenca.versionVersión publicada
dc.ucuenca.volumennúmero 196

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
documento.pdf
Size:
1.17 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
document

Collections