Análisis comparativo de las propuestas curriculares en Filosofía del Bachillerato Diversificado y del Bachillerato General Unificado

Abstract

The present investigation consists in the comparative analysis of the curricular proposals in Philosophy in the Diversified Baccalaureate and Unified General Baccalaureate. It is a descriptive hermeneutic investigation in which we show the different changes that the Philosophy has undergone in relation to a baccalaureate to another, for this a field investigation has been carried out that consists of a bibliographic review and interviews with teachers who dominate the area philosophical with the objective of comparatively analyzing the curricular proposals of the Philosophy in the Diversified Baccalaureate and Unified General Baccalaureate. In the first instance, we characterize Philosophy within the Philosophy curricula in the different baccalaureates and then we compare the Philosophy curricula based on criteria, to identify and reflect on the possible causes that tend to the devaluation of Philosophy in the different curricula thinking about a possible positioning of it in future curricular updates. To our consideration, the conclusions and recommendations obtained in this research contribute to the understanding of the different problems that Philosophy faces as a subject in the different educational curricula.