Colloidal centrifugation for dog sperm selection prior cryopreservation with glycerol.

dc.contributor.authorAyala Guanga, Luis Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorGaray Peña, Gabriela Sofía
dc.contributor.authorCarpio Alemán, Fredi Marco
dc.contributor.authorRodas Carpio, Ermes Ramiro
dc.contributor.authorNieto Escandón, Pedro Emilio
dc.contributor.authorCalle Ortiz, Guido Rigoberto
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-28T18:28:55Z
dc.date.available2020-05-28T18:28:55Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.descriptionBackground: Dog ejaculates are produced in three fractions: the first and third fractions contain prostatic fluid, which is harmful for cryopreservation. The second fraction is spermatozoa-rich. Collecting the second fraction of the ejaculate is complex; hence, colloidal centrifugation plus the addition of glycerol at three different concentrations (4, 6, and 8%) as cryoprotectant was evaluated as a method for sperm selection. Methods: In this study, 72 seminal samples from 6 crossbred dogs were evaluated at the University of Cuenca-Ecuador. Two aliquots were made from each sample, one for conventional centrifugation (Group 1), the other for colloidal centrifugation (Group 2). After centrifugation, each aliquot was subdivided into three parts, and 4, 6, and 8% glycerol were added, respectively. Three sperm evaluations were made (initial, pre-thawing, and post-thawing). Results: Sperm concentration was similar between the initial sample (IS) and Group 1 (P>0.05) after centrifugation, whereas fewer spermatozoa where observed in Group 2 (P <0.05). Evaluation of pre-thawing individual progressive motility (IPM) revealed that the spermatozoa in Group 1 underwent a 30% motility reduction in comparison to the IS and Group 2. Post-thawing IPM within the groups with different concentrations of glycerol (4, 6, and 8%) which underwent previous centrifugation with Percoll (Group 2), showed statistical differences (P <0.05). However, the HOS test produced similar percentages. Conclusions: Colloidal centrifugation prior freezing ensures better sperm selection and purification.
dc.description.abstractBackground: Dog ejaculates are produced in three fractions: the first and third fractions contain prostatic fluid, which is harmful for cryopreservation. The second fraction is spermatozoa-rich. Collecting the second fraction of the ejaculate is complex; hence, colloidal centrifugation plus the addition of glycerol at three different concentrations (4, 6, and 8%) as cryoprotectant was evaluated as a method for sperm selection. Methods: In this study, 72 seminal samples from 6 crossbred dogs were evaluated at the University of Cuenca-Ecuador. Two aliquots were made from each sample, one for conventional centrifugation (Group 1), the other for colloidal centrifugation (Group 2). After centrifugation, each aliquot was subdivided into three parts, and 4, 6, and 8% glycerol were added, respectively. Three sperm evaluations were made (initial, pre-thawing, and post-thawing). Results: Sperm concentration was similar between the initial sample (IS) and Group 1 (P>0.05) after centrifugation, whereas fewer spermatozoa where observed in Group 2 (P <0.05). Evaluation of pre-thawing individual progressive motility (IPM) revealed that the spermatozoa in Group 1 underwent a 30% motility reduction in comparison to the IS and Group 2. Post-thawing IPM within the groups with different concentrations of glycerol (4, 6, and 8%) which underwent previous centrifugation with Percoll (Group 2), showed statistical differences (P <0.05). However, the HOS test produced similar percentages. Conclusions: Colloidal centrifugation prior freezing ensures better sperm selection and purification.
dc.identifier.issn0258-6010, 2224-7920, 0258-6010
dc.identifier.urihttps://revistas.reduc.edu.cu/index.php/rpa/article/view/e2789
dc.language.isoes_ES
dc.sourceRevista de Producción Animal
dc.subjectColloidal centrifugation
dc.subjectCum
dc.subjectDogs
dc.subjectGlycerol
dc.titleColloidal centrifugation for dog sperm selection prior cryopreservation with glycerol.
dc.typeARTÍCULO
dc.ucuenca.afiliacionAyala, L., Universidad de Cuenca, Cuenca, Ecuador; Ayala, L., Universidad de Cuenca, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Cuenca, Ecuador
dc.ucuenca.afiliacionGaray, G., Universidad de Cuenca, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Cuenca, Ecuador
dc.ucuenca.afiliacionCarpio, F., Universidad de Cuenca, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Cuenca, Ecuador
dc.ucuenca.afiliacionRodas, E., Universidad de Cuenca, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Cuenca, Ecuador
dc.ucuenca.afiliacionNieto, P., Universidad de Cuenca, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Cuenca, Ecuador
dc.ucuenca.afiliacionCalle, G., Universidad de Cuenca, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Cuenca, Ecuador
dc.ucuenca.areaconocimientofrascatiamplio4. Ciencias Agrícolas
dc.ucuenca.areaconocimientofrascatidetallado4.3.1 Ciencias veterinarias
dc.ucuenca.areaconocimientofrascatiespecifico4.3 Medicina Veterinaria
dc.ucuenca.areaconocimientounescoamplio08 - Agricultura, Silvicultura, Pesca y Veterinaria
dc.ucuenca.areaconocimientounescodetallado0841 - Veterinaria
dc.ucuenca.areaconocimientounescoespecifico084 - Veterinaria
dc.ucuenca.correspondenciaAyala Guanga, Luis Eduardo, luis.ayala@ucuenca.edu.ec
dc.ucuenca.idautor0102635463
dc.ucuenca.idautor0106047889
dc.ucuenca.idautor1900298660
dc.ucuenca.idautor0102979424
dc.ucuenca.idautor0102840576
dc.ucuenca.idautor0300977238
dc.ucuenca.indicebibliograficoSciELO
dc.ucuenca.numerocitaciones0
dc.ucuenca.urifuentehttps://revistas.reduc.edu.cu/index.php/rpa/issue/view/281
dc.ucuenca.versionVersión publicada
dc.ucuenca.volumenVolumen 31, Numero 1

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
documento.pdf
Size:
445.5 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
document

Collections