Browsing by Author "Peralta Vintimilla, Wilson Geovanny"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5

A study case of the stakeholders´ incidence in two public higher education institutions of Ecuador
(IATED Publications, 2019) Peralta Vallejo, Ximena Katherine; Peralta Vintimilla, Wilson Geovanny; Briozzo, Anahí Eugenia
The stakeholder theory has increased its applicability in the public and private field since Freeman proposed it in1984. Through the years, different authors have suggested methodologies to identify, classify, and prioritize the stakeholders considering dissimilar variables; therefore, the managers have different options to select the most appropriate methodology process. Nevertheless, the public Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) still do not have a specific procedure to evaluate the stakeholders’ incidence in these organizations. Hence, this article proposes a mixed methodology (quantitative and qualitative) to provide a clear level of incidence for each stakeholder. The proposal is based on Savage´s model (2004), and, Mitchel, Agle and Wood´s model (1997) with some required adjustments. The potential stakeholders were included in the variables evaluation, in order to reduce subjectivity in the results. The study case was selected to explain all the methodology process proposed and applied for the public Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) of the zone six in Ecuador.
Critical governance dimensions of public higher education institutions comparision in Ecuador, a retro perspective
(INTED2022, 2022) Peralta Vallejo, Ximena Katherine; Peralta Vintimilla, Wilson Geovanny
Nowadays, Governance is an important management tool which is implemented in different fields. One relevant sector is the public Higher Educations Institutions-HEIs. Therefore, initially it is presented their decision-making under a management approach in Europe, Asia, United States of America and Latin America. Furthermore, it is described the general situation of public HEIs in Ecuador; consequently, it is identified their management models, which allows to explain governance in this context. Following, it is described a model of governance assessment which starts identifying the main stakeholders of the public HEIs of the zone six (Ecuador), and evaluates five dimensions: Management and Administration, Participation, Accountability, Autonomy and Transparency. Hence, this article aims to comprehend the influence of two critical dimensions of Governance: Participation and Accountability, in the final assessment, examining their components. The selected methodology is an explanatory case study because it contrasts the indicators results, identifying critical points and generating a precise feedback.
Governance assessment: a case study in the public university of Ecuador
(International Academy of Technology, Education and Development (IATED), 2020) Peralta Vallejo, Ximena Katherine; Peralta Vintimilla, Wilson Geovanny; Briozzo, Anahí Eugenia; Peralta Vallejo, Ximena Katherine
Governance in public university management has become a trend all over the world. It is investigated in Europe, Africa, Asia, United States and Latin America. Its applicability and importance are supported by several researchers. As a result, there are different methodologies and typologies to evaluate governance. Most of them are theoretical models or guides to analyse its accomplishment, although others evaluate governance with a mixed approach. Considering the Ecuadorian context, there are few investigations about governance evaluation in public university management. Nonetheless, the model proposed evaluates the governance in public Higher Education Institutions. The proposal has the support of the Delphi method, it starts identifying the stakeholders and their level of incidence. Then, it evaluates five dimensions (considering indicators): management, participation, accountability, autonomy and transparency. The objectives of this investigation are, evidencing applicability and validity of the governance model for public university in Ecuador and comparing the public university dimensions results. An explanatory case study is selected to sustenance them. Therefore, two public universities located in the zone six of Ecuador are considered for this case study. In order to evaluate each dimension, the data is collected through surveys, meetings and information requirements in both universities. Successively, the data is validated by an external assessor. The results of five dimensions will provide the measure of governance achievement in public universities. The governance model is applicable and useful as well, to improve public university management
Integral management model for agroecological organizations in Ecuador
(Fórum Internacional de Comunicación y Relaciones públicas (Fórum XXI), 2021) Peralta Vallejo, Ximena Katherine; Álava Atiencie, Nubia Gabriela; Peralta Vintimilla, Wilson Geovanny
The agriculture has been suffering complex difficulties, as of green revolution. Several researchers consider that the solution for these problems is agroecology, which appeared in 1928. Different fields have developed notable contributions; even farmers have obtained political, social and technical support to confront green revolution. Nonetheless, investigations do not consider a business approach. Hence, it is necessary to determinate a proposal to manage agroecology agriculture business. In order to define an appropriate model, this investigation reviews the evolution of agroecology around the world, its development in regions of Latin America as Brazil, Andean Region and Centre America. In addition, it is analyzed the agroecology path in Ecuador. Later, it is explained the necessity of a proposal under a business management approach. The proposed model considers Process Management, Value Based Management and Balanced Scorecard criteria. It is a mixed management tool that will provide support to farmers, as well as to all stakeholders in agriculture, food sovereignty and agroecological sustainability.
Stakeholder identification of the public university in Ecuador
(International Academy of Technology, Education and Development (IATED), 2019) Peralta Vallejo, Ximena Katherine; Peralta Vintimilla, Wilson Geovanny; Briozzo, Anahí Eugenia
Notwithstanding of the different investigations all over the world related with the stakeholders theory and its identification, even today few authors inquire into what model or typology could be the most appropriate for the Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in Latin America, moreover, the problem remains in the public field. Evidently, this problem is present in Ecuador as well. Therefore, looking for a response this paper reviews the stakeholder theory through the years, analysing the different contributions as concepts, definitions, theory validations and complementary models made by important authors. After the reviewing, it is necessary to establish the compatibility between stakeholders and public Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). Complementarily three theories are evaluated: Gardner´s model of power and interest, Savage´s model, and, Mitchell, Agle and Wood´s model. It is proposed a process for each model, in order to complement their methodologies. The mentioned models with their proposed processes will be validated using the Delphi method. The result will find the most appropriate model to identify the stakeholders of the public Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) of the zone six in Ecuador.