La seguridad jurídica y motivación como garantía de los derechos a la libertad personal, integridad personal y principio de no devolución: Análisis de caso contenido en la sentencia No. 1214-18-EP/22.

Abstract

The Plenary Session of the Constitutional Court of Ecuador resolves within the extraordinary protection action contained in sentence No. 1214-18-EP/22, the violation of the rights of security and legal motivation in the first and second instance sentences issued within of the habeas corpus action No. 17240-2018-00006. Action presented by public defender Nina Guerrero regarding people of Nigerian and Cameroonian nationality in situations of human mobility: Aaron Awak, Stephen Yondo Lyonga, Joseline Abo Fon, Miranda Angun Teke, Mbachink Emmanuel Tekoh and Smith Emanuel Mbah held in the area of inadmissible from the Mariscal Sucre airport. The analysis of the content of the resolutions leads the Court to declare the violation of the rights to personal freedom, personal integrity and the principle of non-refoulement. The development of this titling project seeks to emphasize whether the protection and reparation measures issued in ruling No. 1214-18-EP/22 managed to meet the state of motivational sufficiency for the protection of the violated fundamental rights. The methodological process of the case analysis will have a qualitative approach and design, as well as an explanatory scope, with the sole purpose of delving into the reasons that were the basis and motivation for the Constitutional Court of Ecuador to rule as it did, establishing a precedent. . judicial of great importance in our country.