Repository logo
Communities & Collections
All of DSpace
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Fortich Mesa, Natalia"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Eficacia anestésica de lidocaína al 2% con epinefrina 1:80000 y mepivacaína 2% con epinefrina 1:80000 en el bloqueo del nervio infraorbitario
    (Universidad de Cuenca, 2021) Miranda Silva, Clarena; González Salgado, Laura; Víctor Rodríguez, Federico; Harris Ricardo, Jonathan; Fortich Mesa, Natalia
    Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy of lidocaine with epinephrine 1:80,000 and mepivacaine 2% with epinephrine 1:80,000, in the infraorbital nerve block. Methods: experimental study, 100 subjects randomly received infraorbital nerve block, by using 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine and 2% mepivacaine at two separate appointments spaced at least at 1 week apart, teeth were pulp tested, three consecutive times using the three levels of the pulp tester cycles for a total of 120 minutes. Success was defined as no response after to 2 consecutive readings with the electric pulp tester, students described the symptoms and the response generated, latency period and the action time of each patient was recorded. Results: latency was set in seconds, the anesthetic lidocaine showed a mean of 14.69 ± 7.5 SD and 14.88 ± 8.02 mepivacaine, there was no statistically significant differences between the two groups (P = 0.86), while the action time was determined in minutes for the lidocaine was 186.7 ± 54.54 SD and 146.7 ± 39.28 for mepivacaine, differences were statistically significant (P = 0.0000). Conclusions: anesthetic lidocaine is more effective since it has a longer action period and does not represent differences in latency, comparing with mepivacaine.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2026 LYRASIS

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback