Repository logo
Communities & Collections
All of DSpace
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Brito Tenesaca, Andrea Silvana"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Validación del artefacto de centelleo en la ecografía renal para el diagnóstico de nefrolitiasis. Hospital Vicente Corral Moscoso, agosto 2020 – agosto 2021
    (Universidad de Cuenca, 2022-03-08) Brito Tenesaca, Andrea Silvana; Calle Calle, Leonardo Aníbal
    Background: Due to today's lifestyle, there is a higher frequency of nephrolithiasis, which is why non-invasive diagnostic methods and without radiation risks are necessary. Objective: to compare renal ultrasound with scintillation artifact and Urotomography without contrast in the diagnosis of nephrolithiasis. Methodology: diagnostic test in 101 patients with symptoms of renal colic, a renal ultrasound and a Urotomography without contrast were performed. Statistical analysis: SPSS version 15, diagnostic precision: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Results: 101 patients with symptoms of renal colic, Nephrolithiasis was similar in both sexes, the mean age was 32.2 (± 14.5). The prevalence in ultrasound 54.46%, and in Urotomography 77.23%. By ultrasound 55 patients presented lithiasis, most had 1 stone, in the kidney and left side, > 3 to 7 mm, the scintillation artifact was positive 29.09%. In the Urotomography, lithiasis was presented in 78 patients, with 1 to 2 stones in the majority, > 3 to 7 mm, in the kidney and ureter and bilateral, the density of 102 to 700 HU predominated. Comparing the ultrasound scintillation artifact with Urotomography, we obtained a sensitivity of 48.72%, a specificity of 95.65%, a positive predictive value of 97.44%, and a negative predictive value of 35.48%. Conclusions: the ultrasound scintillation artifact should be considered a confirmatory sign for the diagnosis of kidney stones.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback