Repository logo
Communities & Collections
All of DSpace
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Barrera Yanza, Erika Eugenia"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Item
    “Efecto de los aditivos: antibiótico, prebiótico y probiótico en el rendimiento y conteo microbiológico en pollos de engorde”
    (2019-09-23) Barrera Yanza, Erika Eugenia; Chullca Malo, Karina Estefanía; Astudillo Riera, Fabián Manuel
    Objective: to evaluate the effect of an antibiotic, prebiotic, probiotic and the mixture of prebiotic and probiotic on performance and microbiological count in broilers. Materials and methods: 400 one-day hybrid chickens (Cobb 500) were used, weighing 48.28 ± 2 g. A Random Block Design with 5 treatments and 4 repetitions was used. The treatments were: T1 = (negative control), T2 = (growth promoting antibiotic), T3 = MOS = (mannooligosaccharides), T4 = (Bacillus subtillis), T5 = (combination of MOS and BS). The variables evaluated were: live weight (g), food consumption (g), average daily gain (g), food conversion index (g), food efficiency (%), mortality (%) and microbiological count (CFU / gram of intestinal content) For the microbiological count, 2 chickens were taken at random at 21 and 49 days, for each experimental unit (n = 8), which were sacrificed to obtain portions of the ileum and blind, these were sent to the laboratory where it was performed the count (Salmonella spp. and E. coli). Results: T2 live weight reflected statistical differences (p <0.05) on days 0-21 of age, for the rest of the variables no statistical differences were found in any of the periods. The T4 obtained the best production costs. Conclusions: the use of these additives did not reflect marked variations; however, they are alternatives to the use of APC, due to their zero tendency to resistance and not leaving residues in animal products intended for human consumption

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback