Autoevaluación de la Escuela de Medicina de la Universidad de Cuenca 2005-2006, Función Impacto Institucional, comunicación y retroalimentación institucional

Abstract

Cross-sectional study, which can be regarded as an action research, which can intervene, because it allows to know the strengths and weaknesses, and also serves as a basis for developing a plan of development of the School of Medicine, serving as support for progressively continue managing the external evaluation and accreditation by the CONEA. The universe were the principals, teachers, students and outsiders, of which a random cluster sample and to which we applied an interview was obtained, along existing documentation, information collected is anaízó using an instrument constructed, implemented and validated AFEME national level under the guidelines of CONEA. It is said that the work contributes to evaluate the Linking function with respect to the field of institutional communication and feedback with respect to characteristic 21, about if you have a bidirectional communication system to meet the needs of society and to feed back their work institutional, which obtained a final average of 4.1 on a scale of seven, which represents 59, 1, which is a good rating according to the qualitative and quantitative scale given by the CONEA, which shows that the communication system used by the institution is a strength