Comparación entre los criterios para el diagnóstico periodontal de EKE y COLS. y los protocolos del Ministerio de Salud Pública 2014 en pacientes de la Clínica de Periodoncia 2012-2014

Abstract

Introduction: Periodontitis, defined as a chronic inflammatory disease, is one of the most common oral diseases, in fact affects more than half of the world´s population, there is a lot of criteria and parameters to diagnostic this disease without any standardization, with highly variable results prevalence. Materials and Methods: 378 clinical histories from the periodontics area were examined with periodontitis diagnostic in patients older than 25 years. Methods for diagnosing periodontal Eke et al. and dental protocols of the Ministry of Public Health (MSP) 2014 supported in the classification and diagnostic criteria by Armitage were applied. The collected data were analyzed with a (SPSS 20.0 IBM. Chicago, IL) software, and were compared with Kappa correlation index. Results: There is a significant statistically difference between the diagnostics of Eke et. al and MSP 2014 supported in the classification and diagnostic criteria by Armitage; with Eke et al. 25.4% of the patients did not have periodontitis and 3.7%.With MSP 2014. With Eke et al. 16.1% of mild periodontitis, 43.1% moderate periodontitis and 15.3% severe periodontitis was found, while the parameters established by the MSP 2014 observe, 21.7% mild, 34.9% moderate and 39.7% severe periodontitis. Conclusions: There is a significant statistically difference between the methods of Eke et al. with dental protocols MSP 2014, having more case did not considerate as periodontitis with Eke et al. than with the MSP 2014. Periodontitis cases were distributed more often between 45 and 54 years with the two methods